ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:18 am 
Offline
Novice
Novice

Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:06 am
Posts: 73
Hi, i was wondering why the Clavicular portion of the pecs is listed as a synergist on the standing military press, but not on the barbell shoulder press (seated)? Whats the difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:06 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am
Posts: 3986
It is because when you are seated the bench is the synergist.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:12 am 
Offline
Novice
Novice

Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:06 am
Posts: 73
Ironman wrote:
It is because when you are seated the bench is the synergist.


What does it mean to be a synergist? I thought it meant that muscle was an assistor in the move? Like biceps would be to barbell rows???

Im not understanding why the upper pecs would be worked just because you're standing and not sitting...when the movement appears to be the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:20 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:19 pm
Posts: 4410
Location: Pennsylvania
I think they're worked in both, especially if you take a wide grip and lean backwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:39 pm 
Offline
Novice
Novice

Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:06 am
Posts: 73
Hmmm...so maybe its the leaning part thats the key. I can see from the little visuals of the exercises on this site the one thats standing has a little lean to him. Otherwise they seem exactly the same


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:02 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am
Posts: 3986
They both feel like 100% delts and triceps to me. I'm sure lots of muscles keep you standing and keep the weight ballanced when standing. I would think your back works more. You could lean back and get the chest into it, but that would probably be bad for your back. I would do a high incline bench. That way your back is supported and you get the mostly delts but a little clavicular and no sternal sort of effect you seem to be looking for.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group