Anybody reading the
lats section nowadays will see "chinup" and be linked to a plethora of conformism-labelled exercises where the hand will only be in a supinated position.
As those who have read past rants:
1/
2/
3/
4/
5, you will be familiar with the changes in the site which have been documented, and I would like to identify further semantic remnants of how things used to be, the lost age of the 80s, when men were men, and chins were chins.
Examples:
*What is called simply "Chin-up" on the table is actually
Underhand Chinup on the URL.
*What is called "Parallel Close Grip Pull-up" on the table is
Close Grip Chinup on the URL.
This URL ambiguity is also present in the variations on these exercises:
*What is called "Assisted Pull-up (partner)" is called
As Chinup Partner in the URL.
*What is called "Self-assisted Chin-up" is called
As Underhand Chinup Self in the URL.
*What is called "Self-assisted Pull-up" is called
As Chinup Self in the URL.
This last one shows a damning reality: the default of a 'chinup' in this case was the overhand (pronated) grip. The "underhand" was the variation, not the default. This was not unique to ExRx, this semantics was used throughout the 80s. I have some fitness books from that period, and I have marked pages in them, which use this overhand = chin terminology. It was this way for a long time. I've packed them, but if anyone's interested, perhaps I will unpack them in 2013 and show you all.
Someone changed something, and I don't know who. It's a conspiracy.
The weighted variations are also not lacking the evidence of the past people conspire to hide:
*The "Weighted Chin-up" is called
Wt Underhand Chinup*The "Weighted Parallel Close Grip Pull-up" is called
Wt Close Grip ChinupThe truth is apparent. The terms were once interchangeable, or they referred to subtle things like the lean of the torso or the elbow's path. It was never the grip. Never.
Check out this
1952 US Army rehab manual:

Or better yet, this
fitness book from 1884:
