ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 8:42 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 625
Location: Kentucky, USA
While watching the Thibaudeau Bench Press video from his circuit/complex routine, I heard some surprising statements.
The Article: How I Build Muscle and Strip Off Fat – FAST!
The Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5MikmvU ... dded#at=27

Close to the beginning Thibaudeau states that benching without a Bench Press Shirt with the shoulders Down and Tight can cause injury because it's mechanically inefficient. Ultimately, he recommends flairing the elbows more to activate the traps more. This also puts his elbows lower and I would assume creates more external rotation of the shoulders.


To Contradict this, Dave Tate states in almost all of his videos to keep the shoulders tight and tucked more, because it's more efficient and less likely to cause a shoulder injury.
A couple of Dave Tate Videos that we've likely all seen here.
6 week bench press cure: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QnwAoesJvQ
Westside Bench Press: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QnwAoesJvQ

While not a competitive lifter, I try to follow the Dave Tate method as close as I can. That being said, is this form dangerous for those of us lifting "RAW".

Obviously, Dave Tate and Christian Thibaudeau lift for a different goal, so is this why they have such differing opinions that they are stating as truth? Thibaudeau's form does activate the chest more, while Dave Tate's form can limit the range of motion (good for powerlifting) andactivates the triceps more.

What say EXRX Forums...

Cliff

_________________
http://www.pewebhost.com - Website Design and Hosting
http://www.wilburburns.com/ - Wilburburns Wasting time


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:20 pm
Posts: 4424
elbows tucked, shoulders back and down. Anything else bothers my shoulder.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:11 am 
Offline
Associate Member
Associate Member

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:21 am
Posts: 335
Location: Indonesia
Dave also recommends to tuck your elbows like has been said (narrower grip). In this position, it's natural to engage the lats.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
Tate

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:58 am 
Offline
Associate Member
Associate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:52 am
Posts: 551
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
I don't know, I've always tried to keep my shoulders back and down.
But when the weight gets heavier (relatively),
my shoulders shrug up and it provides better stability for me and feels more natural.
Now that I know this, I'm not going to fight it anymore, might help getting a bigger bench?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 7:16 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 625
Location: Kentucky, USA
Jungledoc wrote:
Tate


Got any idea why Thib states that the Tate method is dangerous for non-shirted lifters?


Cliff

_________________
http://www.pewebhost.com - Website Design and Hosting
http://www.wilburburns.com/ - Wilburburns Wasting time


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:15 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
wilburburns wrote:
Jungledoc wrote:
Tate


Got any idea why Thib states that the Tate method is dangerous for non-shirted lifters?


Cliff

No. I'd think that with the elbows less flared that the shoulder is less vulnerable to injury. I think that Thib is a smart guy, especially with muscle physiology, training, etc., but I think in this case he has it wrong.

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:23 am 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 625
Location: Kentucky, USA
OK, your thoughts are the same as mine. Like you, I respect his writings and training, which is why I even brought up the question.

I don't like it when people I respect and consider "smart" say something wrong... Mainly because I'm may not be smart enough to know that they are wrong. :)

Cliff

_________________
http://www.pewebhost.com - Website Design and Hosting
http://www.wilburburns.com/ - Wilburburns Wasting time


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:30 am 
Offline
Associate Member
Associate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:52 am
Posts: 551
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
In the video he said that "shoulders back & down" is used to take advantage of the bench shirt.
The shirt stabilizes the shoulders, without the shirt the lift isn't as efficient.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:06 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
wilburburns wrote:
OK, your thoughts are the same as mine. Like you, I respect his writings and training, which is why I even brought up the question.

I don't like it when people I respect and consider "smart" say something wrong... Mainly because I'm may not be smart enough to know that they are wrong. :)

Cliff
Well, I feel a little arrogant to disagree with someone like him--I wouldn't except that people like Rip and Tate teach it the other way. I actually want to try benching this way and see how it feels. Maybe it's Tate and Rip that are wrong!

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 4:16 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6434
Location: Halifax, NS
Anytime I see 2 experts disagree like that, it's probably some nuance that the rest of us aren't seeing. I bet the agree on most of the basics.

_________________
Stu Ward
_________________
Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food.~Hippocrates
Strength is the adaptation that leads to all other adaptations that you really care about - Charles Staley
_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:20 pm 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:19 pm
Posts: 4452
Location: Pennsylvania
I'm with Tate. I think powerlifting style benching is safer and more efficient.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 738
Why not just do what's more comfortable to you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:26 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:49 am
Posts: 3475
I really like and respect him and his work but I just don't get it. He didn't give any explanation for it either. I actually tried it and it felt horrible but, I guess it would anyway since i'm used to doing the opposite. I actually coach people out of this. You see Tate addressing this in one of his videos - people who "shrug" instead of retracting. I used his trick on a friend/training partner and it worked well (made him do 100 band pull aparts per day for 2 weeks).

My first thought is, what about the lats? They're an important stabiliser of the shoulder and especially during benching. They're also like the "bridge" between you're upper and lower body merging into the lower back (and hips if you follow the fascia). They basically "connect" your shoulders to the opposing hips. There's plenty of info out there on what the lats do, and plenty of tips for benching that include strengthening your lats and actually using them. How do you use them? Well, you depress your shoulders blades..... Give your shoulders a shrug and feel your lats, they'll be soft. Pull the shoulders down and feel them.

I would argue that "shoulders down" is more about taking advantage of the lats than the shirt. More lats = more stability, better transfer of force from lower to upper body, and therefore, more strength.

I'm open to be proved wrong but so far I just can't see any reason why shrugging would be a good thing.

KPj

_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:39 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
Posts: 5247
Location: New Jersey
KPj wrote:
I'm open to be proved wrong but so far I just can't see any reason why shrugging would be a good thing.


I'm wondering too. I think the most common cue I give for everything is "shoulders back and down." Or some variation of that - "pack the shoulder" or "plug the shoulders in" or "squeeze your scapula together and pull them down." And that's for everything from bench pressing to pushups to rows to squats and deadlifts.

Heck, I learned cues for that from my sister, who learned them in her Iyengar yoga classes - they cue that for almost everything, apparently. We can't all be wrong . . .

I suspect Thibs has something else specific in mind and it's just not clear.

_________________
--
Peter V. Dell'Orto
http://strength-basics.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group