ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:19 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 1:02 am 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:45 am
Posts: 11
Hello everyone. I have visited the site & forum searching for info many times over the years and would like to thank everyone for the effort.

My question.

I've seen folks at the gym doing what appears to be a variation of the cable straight arm pulldown that I cannot make sense of.

Using the ExRx video in the page for Cable Straight Arm Pulldown above as comparison (sorry, I'm not authorized to post url links), these guys stand straight rather than bent forward. Also the pulley is not above their heads but at waist level and the range of motion makes the arms travel from front to back. They also use long ropes so that the movement can continue just beyond the gluts.

So, other than the arms remaining straight, it appears to be a very different exercise.

If anyone can make sense of this explanation, I would appreciate comments regarding the muscles it targets and even if it makes sense at all.

Thank you guys.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:08 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6593
Location: Halifax, NS
Is this what you mean? http://exrx.net/WeightExercises/Latissi ... lover.html

Or maybe this? https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/23 ... 47d9c9.jpg

Both exercises are essentially the same, both work the extension movement except the range is different. The second one is into hyperextension. http://exrx.net/Articulations/Shoulder.html#Extension

_________________
Stu Ward
_________________
Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food.~Hippocrates
Strength is the adaptation that leads to all other adaptations that you really care about - Charles Staley
_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:00 pm 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:45 am
Posts: 11
Thank you for the reply.

Yes, the pic with the woman is the one, but with the pulley even lower.

Would be it correct to say that this variation hits the lats less and the delts, pecs, and triceps more? Or would hyperextension imply something else, like greater engagement of the erectors? I'm just trying to make sense of it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:28 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6593
Location: Halifax, NS
I think it's foolish and serves no purpose. I don't know what muscles it would hit. Perhaps lower traps, I'm not sure.

_________________
Stu Ward
_________________
Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food.~Hippocrates
Strength is the adaptation that leads to all other adaptations that you really care about - Charles Staley
_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 31, 2016 12:51 am 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:45 am
Posts: 11
Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group