ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:19 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:31 pm 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2016 12:10 pm
Posts: 13
ExRx gives different muscles for the barbell military press and barbell shoulder press, suggesting that they are different.

However, for the barbell seated military press, it gives the same muscles as it does for the barbell shoulder press.

What's more, for the smith shoulder press, it gives the same muscles as it does for the barbell military press.

Confusing! :lol:

Is there a difference between the military press and shoulder press or not?

I've searched all over the Web for an answer, and I can't find one.

Some say that for it to be a military press, you have to be standing, or you have to be standing as if at attention. Why, then, is there a seated military press?

Others say that for it to be a military press, you have to keep your arms in front of your body (shoulder flexion), whereas for the shoulder press, you have to keep your arms by your sides (shoulder abduction).

This makes sense because ExRx says that:

    unlike the barbell shoulder press, the barbell military press activates the clavicular pec and biceps brachii (short head), both of which can flex the shoulder
    unlike the barbell military press, the barbell shoulder press activates the supraspinatus, which abducts the shoulder.

Why, then, does ExRx give the same muscles for the barbell shoulder press and seated military press?

So confused! :frown:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 5:03 pm 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:38 pm
Posts: 7
it would probably get rid of all leg drive and variation in your posture, it's less athletic. Standing press will require core stabilization and posture that is more varied. I bet yo u can do more on a standing press.

with every press i keep my arms close to my body and perpendicular to the bar at shoulder width or less. that's a good question why would anyone do it seated over standing? seems lazy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2017 1:30 am 
Offline
Novice
Novice
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 12:03 am
Posts: 63
Location: Newport News, Virginia
Kubensis wrote:
it would probably get rid of all leg drive and variation in your posture, it's less athletic. Standing press will require core stabilization and posture that is more varied. I bet yo u can do more on a standing press.

with every press i keep my arms close to my body and perpendicular to the bar at shoulder width or less. that's a good question why would anyone do it seated over standing? seems lazy.


"Why would anyone do it seated over standing?" In my house I have to do the seated press over standing to avoid hitting the ceiling fan!! :)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group