ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 8:47 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:07 am
Posts: 827
Location: Sydney, Australia
For the scientifically minded this thread over at SS might be of interest. I found it interesting.

http://startingstrength.com/resources/f ... post394323

No affiliation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:55 am 
Offline
Apprentice
Apprentice

Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 144
A very good read. It is presented(by the author) in a manner that makes us less educated people understand what the studies were about and what practical impact they may have.

One quote in there really made me laugh:

Quote:
That’s right: Rat squats. The authors used an apparatus that was first described in the literature
by Tamaki et al in 1992. (A similar setup was used in this paper by do Cormo et al, which is also worth
looking at.) These rats were highly motivated, as the experimental apparatus incorporates a shock
mechanism that compels the animals to perform the required exercise. (This of course immediately
suggests a useful modification of training platform design for high school and college athletes, but
that was not the focus of this paper.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:07 am
Posts: 827
Location: Sydney, Australia
the rat squat apparatus was fascinating - the diagram was ace.
the caffeine research reviews were entertaining; most enjoyable was the author's incisive perspective. simple words for potentially complicated research.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 2:34 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 5:25 pm
Posts: 232
Location: Toronto
Great read. The bit about the FMS was fantastic, and I think it illuminates some of the serious issues with with is taken as exercise "fact" versus what is actually supported. A perfect example is the prevailing belief that yoga helps improve range of motion, but if you look at the (very) few studies that have been done there's in fact virtually no evidence to support this belief.

_________________
don't you know there ain't no devil
that's just god when he's drunk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 3:52 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:48 pm
Posts: 1347
Location: New York, USA
The author has read his Heinlein and Adams, he's ok in my book.

Great quote: "no footballs were harmed in the production of this article."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group