Quote:
From what I've learned talking to others and reading lots, the top three are a dunk test (most reliable, but expensive),
There problem with hydrastatic is that the research was conduced on five cadavers, dead people. There are a number of problems with this.
1) Statistics are based on large numbers. The larger the numbers uss the more accurate the results. Cutting up five cadavers does not constitute a large number.
2) These cadavers were not normal health individuals. It would have been better to cut up five normal individuals or athletes. However, there are no volunteers...:)
3) Different formulas are necessary for different ethnic groups.
Thus, while hydrostatic is regarded as the gold standard, it has flaws.
Quote:
caliper 7site, caliper 3site.
Caliper readings are base on hydrostatic. Thus, they are mearly an estimate of body fat percentage.
The most accurate reading is obtained from a technician who has performed hundreds of body fat measurements.
Two other post mention using the Accumeasure Body Fat calipers. These are crap. Also, their instructions are crap. They give you a general area to take the measurements.
To obtain the most accurate measurement, you a tape measure and pen. You then measure and mark with a pen on the body a precise area to caliper.
Another post mentioned that you need to purchase the Lang calipers or another professional model. That is not necessary.
A good technician can get an accurate reading with a fairly good pair of calipers.
Quote:
Callipers are about 15$ at GNC or a similar store.
The GNC calipers are crap.
Quote:
I user callipers on myself and get 16%, my trainer uses callipers on me and gets 17.5%, my scale says I'm 32%...
You CANNOT get a good reading by taking the measurement on yourself. It just not possible.
Scales work off bioelectracal impedance. This method is crap.
The Slim Guide Caliper on exer.net are a great pair of calipers. However, I don't believe they provide you with the correct instruction on how to utilize them.
Kenny Croxdale