ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:24 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 4
I'm an intermediate lifter. I've been lifting for around 3 years now, but I never exactly knew what the optimal number of exercises and sets and reps per body part is.

Here is what I believe:

12-6 reps is good, abs can go till failure, as well as pullups and dips.

3-4 sets is fine, depending on the amount of exercises

4 exercises for chest and back

5 for legs, 2 for hams, 2 for quads, and one for calves is optimal.

2 exercises for bi's and tri's

3 exercises for delts

What do you all think?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 5:54 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:51 pm
Posts: 1802
Location: Mass, USA
Looks good to me...

Is that helping you get to your goals?

Welcome to the boards...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:16 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 1996
Location: Texas
I think it can also depend on what your goals and training schedule are. FWIW, I think training bis and tris are worthless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:32 pm 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 4
Thanks! This website is wonderful. Has plenty of useful info.

I appreciate the responses. I disagree with you when you say training bis and tris exclusively is useless. Isolating them helps add to their growth, as long as you don't overtrain them. If your bis are a little sore after doing back and bis the previous day, you're fine. If you can't move your arms, then you're probably shooting yourself in the foot. That's my opinion. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:25 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
There isn't a simple answer to your question. How many reps per set, how many sets of each exercise, and whether to do more than one exercise per movement depend on so many factors that it's hard to say.

In general, I don't do more than one exercise per movement. Why would I? If you don't think that a given exercise is doing what you need it to do, then do it more, or do something different. Doing different exercises for the same or similar movement in different workouts helps keep variety in your routine, and keeps it from being boring. Changing the exercises in your routine every few weeks also keeps things fresh, and sometimes helps to break through plateaus.

These issues have been discussed extensively in many previous threads. It might be interesting for you to read through some of them to see what the regulars here have to say (and disagree about) in this.

It's often more practical to think in terms of movements rather than muscle groups. Unless, of course, you are a BB trying to bring up particular muscles.

Also, before you just dismiss Hoosegow's opinion about direct bi- and tri- work, you should know that I'd be proud if my legs were the size of his arms. I do plenty of bi and tri work as part of compound exercises, but I almost never do bi or tri isolation work. I just don't have that kind of time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:48 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 4:31 pm
Posts: 613
I'm the opposite, never did direct arm work, just did curls and extensions at the end of my full body work outs. Started doing a day dedicated to arms and have put an inch on in a few months which is more than the last year so just shows really how people are different. But it could be because I've never intensively trained them and they're reacting to something new.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:51 pm
Posts: 1802
Location: Mass, USA
Nevage wrote:
I'm the opposite, never did direct arm work, just did curls and extensions at the end of my full body work outs. Started doing a day dedicated to arms and have put an inch on in a few months which is more than the last year so just shows really how people are different. But it could be because I've never intensively trained them and they're reacting to something new.


The more I look around I feel like Hoose is the exception more than the rule. Plus he is like 290lbs and moves more weight in a set than I do a week, he can feel anyway he wants about the subject matter. He has more than put in his dues. :lol:

But yeah, generally speaking people have to do curls, CGBP, pushdowns, skullcrushers ect... to get large arms.

By large I'm talking 18inchs or more. Although 17's would look huge on someone 5'8" or shorter. But again muscle shape and low bodyfat can make a 16 inch arm look huge and fantastic. I have no peak at all really. I'm going to have to push 18+ to really stand out in a crowd.

The whole "greek ideal" thing is neck=arms=calfs I believe. Well my neck is 18 without any direct training other than traps, so... I've got 1.5 inches to put on my arms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am
Posts: 3987
I don't see why you need more exercises. You can always do more sets of less exercises. If you put too many in there you end up with a bunch of crap that doesn't get you anywhere.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
Is it cynical of me to be waiting for spam links to appear in the first post?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am
Posts: 3987
Nope, I was looking for them too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:33 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 11:21 pm
Posts: 928
Location: Ohio, USA
I tend to not think of CGBPs and close grip underhand chins as direct arm work, but apparently some do. That being said, I've switched too full body twice a week and sadly have thrown in a set of curls at the end of one and a set of lying tri exts in another. I'd prefer the former, but at the end of a full body workout I found I can put more effort in direct arm isolation work than compound isolation arm work. When I was upper lower I did not do curls and tris and was just fine.

That being said, unlike most people you see at a gym, I tend forego my direct arm work at the end if I "don't have the time", but unlike the gym, most people have that mentality with their leg exercises.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:23 am 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 4
Sorry that I haven't answered your responses in a while.

I'm currently on a full body program where I perform one exercise per muscle group of three sets from 12-6 reps. 20-25 minutes of cardio 3 times a week. It's been working great, especially since I switch up my exercises nearly every workout. My bench has gone up a few reps in the past month and a half which is promising for me.

However I think it's time that I move on to a different split. I was thinking of doing an upper/lower split 4 times a week, Mon: upper, Tues: lower, Wed, rest/cardio, Thurs: upper, Fri: upper, Sat-Sun: Rest/cardio.

Any opinions on this type of split? Thanks again everyone. :>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:34 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
If your current, linear, full-body program is working great, why abandon it? You should get all the linear gain you can while you can. When you ACTUALLY STALL, then change to a split program or a periodized program (of which I'm strongly biased toward 5/3/1).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:52 am 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 4
It's odd because I have been lifting for three+ years, and full body workouts make me feel great afterward and have been giving me some impressive results. However, I've been on the same general program for two months now, and figured I should switch it up. But you're right, if it's working, then why stop?

My question is, once I decide to go back into a split schedule again, such as upper/lower, two exercises per muscle should do it, correct? I don't want to be in the gym for two hours hitting 4 exercises per muscle group.

And what is a 5/3/1 split?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:14 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
It depends. If the 2 exercises have a different purpose, then yeah, 2. If not just do enough of 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group