ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Wed Jul 30, 2014 4:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 11:11 am 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
You don't need a pre-bagged product though, it's super cheap and it's called beans/rice. If we eliminated the food stamp program and let private charities handle it, things would gravitate more in that direction of efficiency certainly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 12:07 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:44 pm
Posts: 226
frogbyte wrote:
You don't need a pre-bagged product though, it's super cheap and it's called beans/rice.


Living completely off beans and rice would in no way be the perfect food.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 1:40 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
I agree, but he was complaining originally about cost, and it's healthier than what most people eat. The average church homeless shelter type of food is better than the average American diet as far as I know.

Really top-notch nutritious food is always going to be much more expensive than bare calories to get by food.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 9:00 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 1991
Location: Texas
Yes, cost is an issue and part of the arguement. Perhaps I should rephrase the question.

Given:
We currently have the technology and know-how to make a cheap nutritious food.
This food, while maybe not perfect, would be a hell of a lot healthier than what most people are getting.

Is there anything wrong with giving people a strict diet consisting of the same thing for every meal - basically feeding people like most people feed their pets? Consider it manna from the government if you like.

Whether or not you like Purina, trust big companies or the government is not germane to the discussion. Simply put, is feeding people like most people feed their pets wrong? If so, why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 27, 2010 9:54 pm 
Offline
Associate Member
Associate Member

Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:55 am
Posts: 468
Location: Seattle
No, it is not wrong, because people can choose whether or not to accept the food (if it's charity) or buy it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 10:52 am 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
I eat pretty much the same thing every day anyway. The modern variety of daily food choices certainly did not exist for the majority of mankind's existence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 12:14 pm 
Offline
Associate Member
Associate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:52 am
Posts: 551
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
One thing: if people get the same food day in day out, or worse; every meal, there is chance to develop food allergies or intolerances.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 2:47 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
That's only an issue with the toxins in non-paleo foods though eh? You could probably get by on a massive farming scale with green peas. As far as low-toxin (though not really paleo) foods with broad nutrition go I suspect that'd be the economic winner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 5:12 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6391
Location: Halifax, NS
If you eat too much of anything you will get an imbalance. You need a variety to balance things out. Of course if you're making a nutrition biscuit, you just take all the different foods that collectively make a balanced diet and put them through a blender, press it into a biscuit and add water.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 28, 2010 6:23 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:40 am
Posts: 1991
Location: Texas
Perfect analogy stuward. A nutrition biscuit or Scooby Snack.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:49 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 12:44 pm
Posts: 226
stuward wrote:
If you eat too much of anything you will get an imbalance. You need a variety to balance things out. Of course if you're making a nutrition biscuit, you just take all the different foods that collectively make a balanced diet and put them through a blender, press it into a biscuit and add water.


I would eat that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:01 am 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
I'm not sure I buy into the idea that a single food necessarily means an imbalance and sub-par nutrition. There were lots of cultures through history that ate essentially a single thing - usually fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:51 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6391
Location: Halifax, NS
I think it's possible to get by with a predominantly one food diet, and fish or meat probably works best, but most had some other food mixed in, like sea vegetables or berries.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:14 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:46 pm
Posts: 1455
Hmm I wonder if it'd be economically viable to grow tanks of krill - I don't see nutrition data on krill, but I'll bet it's pretty good. Also fly maggots might be a good deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:32 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6391
Location: Halifax, NS
frogbyte wrote:
Hmm I wonder if it'd be economically viable to grow tanks of krill - I don't see nutrition data on krill, but I'll bet it's pretty good. Also fly maggots might be a good deal.


Insects may be an important source of nutrients some day. You can get by quite nicely on locusts. I saw that in "Hildago" so it must be true.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group