ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Mon Dec 22, 2014 2:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 11:35 am 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:40 pm
Posts: 1141
Location: Lapland, Finland
Bret Contreras covered a very interesting new study on his blog:

The main point the research found out was that respitatory exercises might actually be useful to correcting posture.

  • It was a randomized controlled study that lasted about 4 weeks
  • The study had 26 swimmers as participants. The swimmers were divided into a control group and exercise group, of course.
  • The exercise group did respitatory-muscle exercises for 10 minutes three times a week
  • Before the test and after four weeks they measured three things: Spinal curvature(measured with SpinalMouse, a computer-aided measuring device), trunk-muscle strength(with Isoforce) and pulmonary function(with Autospiro). Following muscles were mentioned as "trunk-muscles": Rectus Abdominis, Transversus abdominis, Longissimus muscle and multifidus muscle. Trunk-muscle exercise was the extension and flexion of the trunk while sitting (90 degree flexion from hip and knees)
  • As the respitarory exercise the reasearch used the spirotiger -device.
  • The results were pretty nice: The angle of the thoracic spine decreased by 13%(5.5 degrees) and Lumbar spine by 17% (3.1 degrees. Also the pulmonary function improved and trunk flexion strength improved by 10%

To put it extremely simply: Breathing exercises did actually reduce spinal angles, and could possibly be used in fighting thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. And it had improvement on core strenght also. The change in spinal curvature could become from the respitatory exercises forcing the ribcage to expand and stretch the thoracic. Also the increase in the intra-abdominal pressure could be responsible for the changes in the lumbar spine. That's very interesting. Increased spinal curvature is not cool, and could cause shoulder issues and lower back pain. This subject needs more studies and possible larger reasearches also, it could be very useful in the future in means of correcting posture.

Your thoughts on the subject? Below is the downloadable PDF-link about the reasearch. Check Bret Contreras's blog also for conclusions and Bret's personal thoughts.
http://posturalrestoration.com/media/pd ... vature.pdf

_________________
Physical Preparedness Coach
Co-Owner of UniFit Oy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:56 am 
Offline
Novice
Novice

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:15 am
Posts: 94
Dub wrote:
Your thoughts on the subject?

My first thought was that they followed your signature advice... Seems too good to be true. Changing spine curvature by "... exercised for 10 minutes thrice a week for 4 weeks" does not sit well with what I know about spine curvature, but then again, I'm not really educated in this area.

After having a look at the research article I still think it's quite amazing, but I noticed that the participants are very young, sixteen YO or so, so maybe their spines are still flexible enough to show these changes. Anyway, just to be on the safe side I'm starting to blowup some balloons right now :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 10:22 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:18 pm
Posts: 204
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
It might not be too good to be true.
When our body doesn't try to survive (so all the time), the next thing it wants is to have enough oxygen. Our left lung is smaller than the right one, so our body twists so it can take more air. And if we don't breath with our diaphragm, we use more of our upper parts of lungs and I guess if our spines are more S-shaped (like in their cases) more air can be sucked in.
And when we learn to breath the right way with moving only our stomach, all of those corrections can be thrown away... The only problem is that after so much time in the wrong position, spine needs some time to return to normal.

_________________
Don’t run if you can walk, don’t walk if you can stand, don’t stand if you can sit,
and if you sat, might as well lie down and take a nap.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 7:15 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7503
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
Stefan 93 wrote:
It might not be too good to be true.
When our body doesn't try to survive (so all the time), the next thing it wants is to have enough oxygen. Our left lung is smaller than the right one, so our body twists so it can take more air. And if we don't breath with our diaphragm, we use more of our upper parts of lungs and I guess if our spines are more S-shaped (like in their cases) more air can be sucked in.
And when we learn to breath the right way with moving only our stomach, all of those corrections can be thrown away... The only problem is that after so much time in the wrong position, spine needs some time to return to normal.

This is really pretty confused. Where would I start?

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 7:38 pm 
Offline
n00b
n00b

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:33 pm
Posts: 8
Dub wrote:
To put it extremely simply: Breathing exercises did actually reduce spinal angles, and could possibly be used in fighting thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis.


I wouldn't look too much into it.

Heavy squatting surely has to be one of the most damaging practices to increasing both the thoracic and lumbar spine angles.

Your not going to give up squatting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:49 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:40 pm
Posts: 1141
Location: Lapland, Finland
Performance wrote:
I wouldn't look too much into it.
Heavy squatting surely has to be one of the most damaging practices to increasing both the thoracic and lumbar spine angles.
Your not going to give up squatting.

What's all this now? Squatting bad for posture? I have actually never heard that before, can you give any references? Even if it does do that, I wouldn't give up squatting. I would just keep on rowing.

_________________
Physical Preparedness Coach
Co-Owner of UniFit Oy.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 1:27 am 
Offline
Apprentice
Apprentice
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:45 pm
Posts: 196
Dub wrote:
I would just keep on rowing.


Do you prefer the straight back variation or the regular row? (for seated cable rows that is)

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:05 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:20 pm
Posts: 4424
straight back


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:12 am 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:40 pm
Posts: 1141
Location: Lapland, Finland
emil3m wrote:
Do you prefer the straight back variation or the regular row? (for seated cable rows that is)
I always use free weights. So the seated is out of question. Plus, every row should be straight back (or atleast good posture).
BB Rows from floor(deadstop), Bent-over BB rows (different grips; wide/narrow), DB Rows (either standing or half-kneeling/Kroc-rows or regular DB rows), Inverted rows, pull-ups. You name it. Any row that works the back muscles.

_________________
Physical Preparedness Coach
Co-Owner of UniFit Oy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group