Now to see if I can pick more of Kennys brains...
Kenny Croxdale wrote:
Also from my experience, movements that must be start with no eccentric preloading are like driving your car in town. The constant stop-start of driving into burn more gas, wears out the brakes and is harder on the car.
This makes sense. I've noticed dead-bench and dead-squats seem to be much harder on your joints than standard bench and squat variations which have an eccentric.
Kenny Croxdale wrote:
[color=#000080]Form Deteriation
The lower back is vulnerable joint. However, I don't believe that the deadlift is more vurnerable to form deteriation than any other movement in a fatigued state.
Once fatigue set in with any movement, your technique falls apart.
I agree. Just to clarify, I really mean that, with other movements, when technique breaks it's not always at the expense of the lower back. For example in a squat I find knees cave in before it's turned into a squat-morning. With bench I find elbows flare too much or too soon or you just get pinned. So I find these variations are a little more forgiving when technique falters. With deadlift, I find technique can be perfect then you add another 10lbs or go for one more rep and the spine bends. Not always, though, sometimes I find the hips shoot up but the back stays flat. Normally they just round, though.
Kenny Croxdale wrote:
Some rounding of the back was once considered "doing it wrong." However, under the right conditions, some round of the back may be "mother nature" way of protecting your back and placing it in a stronger position.
"A Strong Case for The Rounded Deadlift." Contreras
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_art ... k_deadliftOverall, I agree with Contreras assesment. I question some minor points.
Yeh, I wasn't too impressed with it, really. The examples he used to support the case of rounded back deadlifting somehow being a "good" or "protective" technique are that of competitive, mostly elite lifters, competing in the deadlift as a sport. This makes me think of the old MMA analogy - they don't go and (intentionally) take elbows to the face in training, they save that for competition, there's only so many times you can take an elbow to the face.
I did think his "theory" about being able to get more out of the lumbar erectors when they are in flexion, as well as more IAP was interesting. Still, though, I don't think it's worth the risk unless you are going for a 1RM attempt and/or you compete in the lift.
It made me think of the few times i've tried deadlifting with a weight belt on - I felt like it was encouraging my back to round. Really didn't like it. I never gave it a chance, though.
Kenny Croxdale wrote:
In developing deadlift strength, I am not a fan of using the deadlift as an exercise.
This is something I've seen you write a lot, and also seen written from Louie Simmons. However, to be honest i've always questioned it due to so many variables involved - technique being one big one. For example I believe pulling with a rounded back will eat into your recovery more than pulling with a neutral spine... How is it performed and how is it programmed?
I've figured it's something that probably only applies to advanced-elite level lifters and not us mere intermediates. I figure we probably need the practice just now. I also agree it's better to train at lower reps. What you said about muscle-firing sequence changing with max loads makes a lot of sense.
Back to deadlifting for a big deadlift - I love Westside Barbell and i'm a big fan of how they train and use many of the principles myself. On my "first journey" to 500lbs, I hardly every done the conventional deadlift. It was all rotations through Box squats, other squat variations, sumos, with assistance exercises programmed like GHR's, Rack pulls, RDL's, etc.
However on my journey back up to >500lbs things have had to change a little. A year away from heavy deadlifts and squats meant i've had to re groove not just the movements but straining with heavy weights. Also, one of the movements that really kicked my conventional up from about 450 to just over 500lbs was the sumo deadlift, but I can't quite do that just now because i'm not quite 100%. In other words my exercise choice is till a little limited - it makes rotating through "special exercises" a bit tricky (not impossible, though). Mostly, wide stance variations of both squat and DL really seemed to help my conventional but I can't do much with a wide stance at the moment.
So for variations I've been on the "I will deadlift often to deadlift heavy" journey but, trying to do so in a way that doesn't eat into the recovery of other lifts. I've also came across various good lifters who do this, I've mentioned Josh bryant and Ed coan but, you also have other freaks like Andy Bolton, Bennie Magnusson or Konstantine Konstanov (i don't know if i've spelled anything correctly). I've also recently got friendly with some powerlifters in my area, a couple of which hold british records, and all of which "train" the deadlift, so it's made me think about it more. In other words, there are people who deadlift a lot and for a while who train the deadlift. However the people who do deadlift a lot in training, seem to emphasise a different approach when training compared to competition, which is normally summarised with - leave reps in the tank, lift with good technique, don't be a hero, leave the craziness for the platform.
In short, "i don't know", but this is what goes on in my head, or at least some of what goes on.
The progression mentioned in this thread isn't something I would use to get my numbers up for a meet, though. It's more about taking your foot off the gas and focusing on quality, for a change.
The rep scheme is something that puzzles me. The more experience I get the more I prefer deadlifts to be in the 1-3 range per set and, really like singles. However, I can't really say "why", and that's what puzzles me. I like more for squats, for example. I read a lot of good people talk about higher rep sets for squat and even bench, even more so for any kind of row, but never deadlift.
This is why it's so fun, I guess.
KPj