ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:01 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:58 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7496
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
This thread has gotten me thinking about my own training, which is, I suppose, what all good threads should do.

So it's time to think things over. Everything I'm doing has evolved into low-rep. Time to juggle things around a bit.

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
Veteren Member
Veteren Member

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 2406
robertscott wrote:
why fixate on your 1-3RM? If you bench 100k for 10 one week, then lift it for 12 two weeks later, hast thou not gotten stronger?

why fixate on an arbitrary number of reps?


1. Yes, probably
2. It's easier to track and has les variace than number of reps, when reps gets to be 10 or so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
Posts: 5247
Location: New Jersey
Jungledoc wrote:
This thread has gotten me thinking about my own training, which is, I suppose, what all good threads should do.

So it's time to think things over. Everything I'm doing has evolved into low-rep. Time to juggle things around a bit.


Per your earlier thread, I find older lifters recover from higher intensity more than from overall volume training (meaning sets x reps x weight, not just sets x reps). I'm not sure why that is, although it's hardly universal - my ultra-marathon runner friend can handle volume in a day that would floor me if I did it in a week. But with my older clients, I worry more about having them do too much than having them go too hard - speaking in very general terms. If they do too much it's more likely to wear them down than having them go heavy for less reps - the total poundage with the heavier weights is less, and I think that matters.

So I'd recommend going higher reps with significantly lower weight - enough to matter for your reps but not so much total that it crushes you. You might want to look at something like EDT, or back off to a bodybuilding-type phase (3-5 sets of 10-20 reps of lots of smaller exercises) for a couple weeks, and then get back on the intensity horse. You can also try just taking a week or two for practice - pick a couple exercises you don't normally do (TGUs, Windmills, clean and press, farmer's walks), a weight you can handle pretty easily with them, and just practice for an hour or so. It'll end up being a fair amount of work done but nothing insane.

Personally, I kind of like EDT, done with technically simple exercises. It's really hard, but the weights are never so heavy that any given rep is hard. After a few weeks, it's nice to back off to heavier weights for fewer reps, no matter how much heavier that is.

_________________
--
Peter V. Dell'Orto
http://strength-basics.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:06 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:20 pm
Posts: 4422
Oscar_Actuary wrote:
robertscott wrote:
why fixate on your 1-3RM? If you bench 100k for 10 one week, then lift it for 12 two weeks later, hast thou not gotten stronger?

why fixate on an arbitrary number of reps?


1. Yes, probably
2. It's easier to track and has les variace than number of reps, when reps gets to be 10 or so.


I would've thought that as an actuary number crunching would come easy to you :)

maybe it's just because the majority of my training is higher volume that I find it easy to track progress when doing higher reps...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:33 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:20 pm
Posts: 4422
there's been some interesting discussion in this thread, I've enjoyed it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 7:30 pm 
Offline
Veteren Member
Veteren Member

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 2406
robertscott wrote:
Oscar_Actuary wrote:
robertscott wrote:
why fixate on your 1-3RM? If you bench 100k for 10 one week, then lift it for 12 two weeks later, hast thou not gotten stronger?

why fixate on an arbitrary number of reps?


1. Yes, probably
2. It's easier to track and has les variace than number of reps, when reps gets to be 10 or so.


I would've thought that as an actuary number crunching would come easy to you :)

maybe it's just because the majority of my training is higher volume that I find it easy to track progress when doing higher reps...


You've reminded me of the importance of programming and tracking results of higher rep work too, and not putting it in as an after thought. On my higher volume weeks, I'm going to be more cognisant of the opportnuity to progress. Same with the back off higher rep sets

sometimes I get sick of looking at numbers all day

last night I wasn't feelnig the normal routine, so I decided to do 10-9-8...2,1,2,3,4....10 Squats, with the "1" being 5lb less than my 2 RM and increments were 11 lbs.
I never got to the back side of the pyramid. I hate most of you. TBH, I was going to jsut go 5x7 at the 5 rep weight (I was concerned about being too worn out to stay heavy), but upon decent I felt a something right near the inside of the right knee cap, and hung it up. I shoulda done some RDLs. I like trying differnt things on days I'm otherwise not feeeling it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 7:56 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity

Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:20 pm
Posts: 4422
Oscar_Actuary wrote:
I hate most of you.


:(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 8:25 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7496
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
pdellorto wrote:
Jungledoc wrote:
This thread has gotten me thinking about my own training, which is, I suppose, what all good threads should do.

So it's time to think things over. Everything I'm doing has evolved into low-rep. Time to juggle things around a bit.


Per your earlier thread, I find older lifters recover from higher intensity more than from overall volume training (meaning sets x reps x weight, not just sets x reps). I'm not sure why that is, although it's hardly universal - my ultra-marathon runner friend can handle volume in a day that would floor me if I did it in a week. But with my older clients, I worry more about having them do too much than having them go too hard - speaking in very general terms. If they do too much it's more likely to wear them down than having them go heavy for less reps - the total poundage with the heavier weights is less, and I think that matters.

So I'd recommend going higher reps with significantly lower weight - enough to matter for your reps but not so much total that it crushes you. You might want to look at something like EDT, or back off to a bodybuilding-type phase (3-5 sets of 10-20 reps of lots of smaller exercises) for a couple weeks, and then get back on the intensity horse. You can also try just taking a week or two for practice - pick a couple exercises you don't normally do (TGUs, Windmills, clean and press, farmer's walks), a weight you can handle pretty easily with them, and just practice for an hour or so. It'll end up being a fair amount of work done but nothing insane.

Personally, I kind of like EDT, done with technically simple exercises. It's really hard, but the weights are never so heavy that any given rep is hard. After a few weeks, it's nice to back off to heavier weights for fewer reps, no matter how much heavier that is.

Thanks, Peter. These are good ideas. I think I'll move my comments on this to my journal discussion thread.

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 5/3/1 Question
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:14 am 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
Posts: 5247
Location: New Jersey
Oscar_Actuary wrote:
last night I wasn't feelnig the normal routine, so I decided to do 10-9-8...2,1,2,3,4....10 Squats, with the "1" being 5lb less than my 2 RM and increments were 11 lbs.
I never got to the back side of the pyramid.


I'm not surprise dude, 10-1-10 squats like that is, what 109 reps? With the heaviest being within 5 pounds of your best double? That would kill me, unless I went a lot lighter.

_________________
--
Peter V. Dell'Orto
http://strength-basics.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group