ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Wed Aug 27, 2014 6:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline
Veteren Member
Veteren Member

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 2406
In general, wouldn't it make sense to have different formulae for different lifts?

For example, the OH Press vs Bench. I figure given an accurate 1 RM, I can kick out more reps at 80% of that on Bench than I can for OH Press.

Ex
1 RM bench; 200, 80% 160
1 RM press: 120, 80% 96

And take this logic to squat. I'd say its even more so. Meaning even more reps than Bench. IDK, to me the large muscles can sustain the lifting longer.

Am I all wrong and the formulas are good enough to us across all lifts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:34 pm 
Offline
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
Posts: 5247
Location: New Jersey
No, it would likely be different across all lifts, although it might not vary that much. It would vary more across lifters than across lifts done by that lifter, if you follow.


It also varies, in my experience, by sex. I've had women knock off sets of 12-15 reps with a weight, then you add 5 pounds to the bar and they get 0 reps. They seem to get higher reps at a much higher percent of the 1RM than men, for any lift. I'm not sure why that is.

_________________
--
Peter V. Dell'Orto
http://strength-basics.blogspot.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:44 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7496
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
I think that there have been attempts to develop formulas for specific lifts. I once came across a website that had (as I recall), 24 different formulas. You could enter one set of variables and get the results that each of them generated. My problem was that the text was all in French, which, despite Madame Lytle's best efforts, I can't read. Of course now I could use something like Google Translate, so maybe I should try to find it again.

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7496
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
http://www.club150kg-dc.fr/Goodies/Contenu/PECSonline_Frameset%28uk%29.htm

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:52 pm 
Offline
Associate Member
Associate Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:52 am
Posts: 551
Location: Antwerp, Belgium
I just use the one from this site: http://exrx.net/Calculators/OneRepMax.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7496
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
Wouter wrote:
I just use the one from this site: http://exrx.net/Calculators/OneRepMax.html

Why do you prefer it?

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RM Formulas
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:48 pm
Posts: 1349
Location: New York, USA
Oscar_Actuary wrote:
In general, wouldn't it make sense to have different formulae for different lifts?

For example, the OH Press vs Bench. I figure given an accurate 1 RM, I can kick out more reps at 80% of that on Bench than I can for OH Press.


The formula in Wendler's book (which is not original to him) can be generalized to:

1RM = Weight * (1 + Reps/k)

Where the value of 33 for k is pretty common, and is meant to hit the middle of the bell curve for general fast/slow twitch mix. For those with generally more slow twitch, who are better at endurance, you want to predict a lower number, so k goes up, making each rep worth less in predicting the 1RM.

This formula works pretty well for me on bench and squat, suggesting I'm average. It falls off for dead and press, in opposite directions. Not surprisingly, it overpredicts for me for Press, which involves smaller muscles than bench and squat. For dead it undepredicts, which also makes sense because there are more fast twitch muscles working there.

That's all I know.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group