ExRx.net

Exercise Prescription on the Net
It is currently Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:21 am 
Offline
Rookie
Rookie

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:20 pm
Posts: 23
I've never been fond of machines. Am I neglecting anything that can't be trained by other means? Er, rather, what am I missing that gives everyone else so much faith in machines?

I mean weight machines, not that lame stuff that they sell on TV at 4 in the morning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:20 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6401
Location: Halifax, NS
Weight machines are easier to teach. They also directly stimulate the target muscles without engaging many stabilizing muscles. This gives the illusion of strength gains with little effort. This is appealing to novices and other people who want something for nothing.

_________________
Stu Ward
_________________
Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food.~Hippocrates
Strength is the adaptation that leads to all other adaptations that you really care about - Charles Staley
_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:29 am 
Offline
Exalted Seer
Exalted Seer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:20 pm
Posts: 2087
Location: New York City
Oniw17 wrote:
I've never been fond of machines. Am I neglecting anything that can't be trained by other means? Er, rather, what am I missing that gives everyone else so much faith in machines?


It's a matter of individual preference. The typical person who joins a commercial gym would rather use machines than free weights. Machines are easier to use and have a high tech look to them that many trainers find more appealing than barbells and dumbbells.

Circuit training is much easier to do with machines than free weights

And there are a few exercises - leg curls and calf raises come to mind - that are hard to do with free weights.

Most studies continue to suggest that free weights are superior to machines for building functional strength. But then again, serious audiophiles consider vinyl LPs to be superior in sound quality to CDs. That hasn't helped the LPs market share. Hell, CDs are being ousted by the lower quality MP3s. It all comes down to convenience and ease of use.

_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:44 pm
Posts: 6401
Location: Halifax, NS
Stephen Johnson wrote:
... But then again, serious audiophiles consider vinyl LPs to be superior in sound quality to CDs. That hasn't helped the LPs market share


The initial drop in LP sales was because the record companies could make more money off a CD than an LP so they stopped making LPs. It had nothing to do with lack of demand. Those of us that were collecting LPs at the time were forced to make a change that we did not want to make. Lets not rewrite history.

_________________
Stu Ward
_________________
Let thy food be thy medicine, and thy medicine be thy food.~Hippocrates
Strength is the adaptation that leads to all other adaptations that you really care about - Charles Staley
_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
Rookie
Rookie

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:20 pm
Posts: 23
Same reason VHS outlived betamax and dvd will outlive blue ray.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:53 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 618
Location: Ostenfelde (GER)
machines only have one advantage: you can't injure yourself in most of the machines. but machines of this kind http://www.exrx.net/WeightExercises/Ere ... nsion.html are very dangerous. i think deadlifting 1000 kg is saver than using this machine.

_________________
"his hands can't hit what his eyes can't see" - muhammad ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:48 pm
Posts: 1349
Location: New York, USA
I'm not so sure about that business with not injuring yourself on machines. You can do a number on your lower back with a leg press.

If you're moving, you can hurt yourself. If you're moving against resistance you can hurt yourself. The more weight, the more damage you can do.

This is not a scientific fact, just a gut feeling.

Also there's that business with not requiring stabilizers to get strong on machines, so if you move to real life or free weights you are more likely to get injured because of weak stabilizers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 4:51 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 618
Location: Ostenfelde (GER)
it's right, you can injure yourself at the leg press, also if you extend your legs too much, then your knees get fv(k up.

but you can say: it takes one instruction to master a machine, but it can take years to master a barbell exercise.

_________________
"his hands can't hit what his eyes can't see" - muhammad ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:29 pm 
Offline
Exalted Seer
Exalted Seer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:20 pm
Posts: 2087
Location: New York City
stuward wrote:
Those of us that were collecting LPs at the time were forced to make a change that we did not want to make.


As someone who has a collection of over 700 LPs, I can empathize with the feeling of betrayal audiophiles have towards the record companies for pulling the plug prematurely on LPs in the 1990s. But the record companies core group of consumers (kids between 15-24) had already moved away from vinyl in favor of CDs greater portability, convenience and durability. The same group has moved on from CDs to MP3s a decade later for the same reasons. That time, the record companies wound up on the receiving end of tech change pain. Poetic justice.

_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:16 am 
Offline
Veteren Member
Veteren Member

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:12 pm
Posts: 2406
aside from the anticpation that cracking and popping sound gives you with an lp, I'll go for CDs, for sound quality and convenience.
After years, I have caved to MP3s, trying to stay with less compressed versions. At some point (300 +CDs, 150 Lps, etc), I cant justify getting the full CD for Cher Lloyd's "Want You Back" single
Ya dig?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:58 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7502
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
HIJACK!

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:59 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Posts: 7502
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea
ephs wrote:
machines only have one advantage: you can't injure yourself in most of the machines. but machines of this kind http://www.exrx.net/WeightExercises/Ere ... nsion.html are very dangerous. i think deadlifting 1000 kg is saver than using this machine.

Elaborate?

_________________
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:32 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 618
Location: Ostenfelde (GER)
machines are static, you just have to hold the position, where are you sitting in and if you aren't doing crazy things, then you won't injure yourself.

i used this machine from the link, i think this machine is very dangerous, if you don't use the optimal distance from seat to the pad on your back, cause you can easily round your back in that machine and this is totally fv(k up your lower back. this machine should be forbidden, seriously.

_________________
"his hands can't hit what his eyes can't see" - muhammad ali


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 12:54 pm 
Offline
Exalted Seer
Exalted Seer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:20 pm
Posts: 2087
Location: New York City
ephs wrote:
i used this machine from the link, i think this machine is very dangerous.


The link in question is to an older model of the lever back extension machine. Newer models like this one secure your hips/back in the right position at the start of the exercise.

Back extension machines of this newer type are common in commercial gyms in the US. If a lawyer could sniff a lawsuit out of this you better believe that gyms would remove them.

_________________
Thanks TimD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Machines
PostPosted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 618
Location: Ostenfelde (GER)
i don't know which one they have in the gym where i train, but i think machines like this are dangerous. with a good instruction and a spotting gym owner it's maybe no problem. but, this machines are also senseless. why not performing a safer 45 degrees hyperextension instead?

_________________
"his hands can't hit what his eyes can't see" - muhammad ali


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group