Fat Burner Supplement

Ask and answer questions, discuss research and applications

Moderators: Ironman, Jungledoc, ianjay, stuward

User avatar
brook011
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am

Post by brook011 » Sun May 11, 2008 11:02 am

no, not ephedra, ephedrine. still buyable as long as its not marketed as a weight loss supplement. usually says its for "asthma" on the package. and yes, overdosing is what brought it off the market.

User avatar
Ironman
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3991
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am

Post by Ironman » Sun May 11, 2008 12:23 pm

That ban got lifted anyway.

User avatar
brook011
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 537
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:08 am

Post by brook011 » Sun May 11, 2008 6:32 pm

supposedly, but I can't find it anywhere. and no one will put it in their product in the previous form. its always some fake closely named product or its some sort of extract. not the same.

User avatar
Ironman
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3991
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am

Post by Ironman » Mon May 12, 2008 3:12 am

It's out there, but the price is inflated. It will come down as it becomes more available. They just need time to market new products.

Chris_A
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 3:13 pm

Post by Chris_A » Mon May 12, 2008 1:25 pm

I'm pretty sure Ephedra is still banned. The ban was lifted in April 2005, but reinstated in August of that same year.

If anyone knows differently, please post! I couldn't find anything refuting the ban being in place.

http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/new ... dra-recall
In April 2005, the ban was successfully challenged by Nutraceutical Corporation, since the 1994 Dietary Supplements Health and Education Act (DSHEA) does not make mention of risk-benefit balance in establishing whether a supplement presents an unreasonable risk. Rather, the FDA drew on the medical devices provisions of the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act, which does state that this is a determining factor.


However, this was then overturned by the federal appeals court decision in August of the same year.

Since then the pendulum has swung back and forth on appeal. The latest came in May last year when the US Court of Appeals rejected the Utah-based firm's challenge to the ban on the grounds that FDA's determination of "unreasonable risk" was itself unreasonable and meant virtually all dietary supplement ingredients stood the risk of being banned.

The court rejected the appeal without comment.

Post Reply