post 1 This is hearsay, and is therefore the proof by authority logical fallacy
2 Same us above unless you provide the study
3 Provide the studies showing this
4 proof by authority logical fallacy
5 red herrings
6 Rats lived to natural death, this invalidates cancer studies.
7 Not a proper study, lack of information makes it nothing but hearsay.
8 Lots of typical conspiracy theory red herrings
9 Jebus provided a pretty good one. Read that.
10 Blogs are hearsay.
11 In the first relation does not prove causation, neither were other factors taken into consideration. This is typical of junk science. In the second, it was splenda, and it was rats. It was not duplicated in humans.
You seem to choose rat studies, when human studies are available. Probably because of the results. This is confirmation bias.
Your large volume of links is the proof by verbosity logical fallacy. It is done to look impressive and discourage investigation. It is nearly universal in all conspiracy theories.