How does 2 by 10 equate to 4 by 5

Ask or answer questions, discuss and express your views

Moderators: Ironman, Jungledoc, parth, stuward, jethrof

Post Reply
User avatar
ApolytonGP
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 1122
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:44 am

How does 2 by 10 equate to 4 by 5

Post by ApolytonGP » Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:27 pm

IOW if I am doing 100# of an exercise at 2 by 10, would I lower the weight or raise it for 4 by 5? Assume, I am at failure on the last rep of the 2 by 10 and want to be at failure on the last rep of the 4 by 5.


User avatar
Stephen Johnson
Exalted Seer
Exalted Seer
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:20 pm
Location: New York City

Re: How does 2 by 10 equate to 4 by 5

Post by Stephen Johnson » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:11 pm

ApolytonGP wrote:IOW if I am doing 100# of an exercise at 2 by 10, would I lower the weight or raise it for 4 by 5? Assume, I am at failure on the last rep of the 2 by 10 and want to be at failure on the last rep of the 4 by 5.
Using your 100# example for 2x10, try 120# for 4x5 and see how you handle it. Also, take longer breaks between sets. Depending on your fast twitch/slow twitch muscle composition, you might be able to handle 10-30% more weight for 4x5 than 2x10.

User avatar
ApolytonGP
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 1122
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:44 am

Post by ApolytonGP » Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:20 pm

How about circuiting with opposing muscle groups vice resting. How much if any, do you think that affects weight lifted.

IOW 10 weighted dips
10 rows
10 weighted dips
10 rows
(no rests)

Versus
10 weighted dip
rest
10 weighted dips
rest
10 rows
rest
10 rows.

User avatar
Stephen Johnson
Exalted Seer
Exalted Seer
Posts: 2097
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:20 pm
Location: New York City

Post by Stephen Johnson » Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:20 pm

ApolytonGP wrote:How about circuiting with opposing muscle groups vice resting. How much if any, do you think that affects weight lifted..
Why not try both methods and come up with your own solution?

Endless analysis is a poor substitute for actually rolling up your sleeves and doing the work. It has appeal to people who like to procrastinate. Experience is the best teacher.

User avatar
ApolytonGP
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 1122
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:44 am

Post by ApolytonGP » Mon Jun 21, 2010 10:58 pm

OK.


User avatar
Jungledoc
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7578
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea

Post by Jungledoc » Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:05 pm

Stephen Johnson wrote:Endless analysis is a poor substitute for actually rolling up your sleeves and doing the work. It has appeal to people who like to procrastinate. Experience is the best teacher.
I hereby nominate Stephen for the rank of Exalted Seer. I will preserve this quote for future generations.

Han
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:14 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by Han » Tue Jun 22, 2010 12:10 am

Yes. I can think of some people on this board for which this quote is the answer to 90% of their questions ...

User avatar
Ironman
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3992
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 11:40 am

Post by Ironman » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:09 am

So can I.....

User avatar
Jungledoc
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7578
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea

Post by Jungledoc » Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:57 am

Really?


I'm thinking....


Post Reply