RM Formulas

Ask or answer questions, discuss and express your views

Moderators: Ironman, Jungledoc, ianjay, stuward

Post Reply
Oscar_Actuary
Veteren Member
Veteren Member
Posts: 2406
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:12 pm

RM Formulas

Post by Oscar_Actuary » Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:52 pm

In general, wouldn't it make sense to have different formulae for different lifts?

For example, the OH Press vs Bench. I figure given an accurate 1 RM, I can kick out more reps at 80% of that on Bench than I can for OH Press.

Ex
1 RM bench; 200, 80% 160
1 RM press: 120, 80% 96

And take this logic to squat. I'd say its even more so. Meaning even more reps than Bench. IDK, to me the large muscles can sustain the lifting longer.

Am I all wrong and the formulas are good enough to us across all lifts?

User avatar
pdellorto
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Deific Wizard of Sagacity
Posts: 5252
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
Location: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: RM Formulas

Post by pdellorto » Fri Oct 26, 2012 5:34 pm

No, it would likely be different across all lifts, although it might not vary that much. It would vary more across lifters than across lifts done by that lifter, if you follow.


It also varies, in my experience, by sex. I've had women knock off sets of 12-15 reps with a weight, then you add 5 pounds to the bar and they get 0 reps. They seem to get higher reps at a much higher percent of the 1RM than men, for any lift. I'm not sure why that is.
--
Peter V. Dell'Orto
http://strength-basics.blogspot.com

User avatar
Jungledoc
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7578
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea

Re: RM Formulas

Post by Jungledoc » Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:44 am

I think that there have been attempts to develop formulas for specific lifts. I once came across a website that had (as I recall), 24 different formulas. You could enter one set of variables and get the results that each of them generated. My problem was that the text was all in French, which, despite Madame Lytle's best efforts, I can't read. Of course now I could use something like Google Translate, so maybe I should try to find it again.
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan

User avatar
Jungledoc
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7578
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea

Re: RM Formulas

Post by Jungledoc » Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:14 am

Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan

User avatar
Wouter
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 551
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 4:52 am
Location: Antwerp, Belgium

Re: RM Formulas

Post by Wouter » Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:52 pm

I just use the one from this site: http://exrx.net/Calculators/OneRepMax.html

User avatar
Jungledoc
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7578
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea

Re: RM Formulas

Post by Jungledoc » Sat Oct 27, 2012 4:44 pm

Wouter wrote:I just use the one from this site: http://exrx.net/Calculators/OneRepMax.html
Why do you prefer it?
Our greatest fear should not be of failure, but of succeeding at things in life that don't really matter.--Francis Chan

User avatar
KenDowns
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts: 1415
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:48 pm
Location: New York, USA
Contact:

Re: RM Formulas

Post by KenDowns » Sat Oct 27, 2012 4:50 pm

Oscar_Actuary wrote:In general, wouldn't it make sense to have different formulae for different lifts?

For example, the OH Press vs Bench. I figure given an accurate 1 RM, I can kick out more reps at 80% of that on Bench than I can for OH Press.
The formula in Wendler's book (which is not original to him) can be generalized to:

1RM = Weight * (1 + Reps/k)

Where the value of 33 for k is pretty common, and is meant to hit the middle of the bell curve for general fast/slow twitch mix. For those with generally more slow twitch, who are better at endurance, you want to predict a lower number, so k goes up, making each rep worth less in predicting the 1RM.

This formula works pretty well for me on bench and squat, suggesting I'm average. It falls off for dead and press, in opposite directions. Not surprisingly, it overpredicts for me for Press, which involves smaller muscles than bench and squat. For dead it undepredicts, which also makes sense because there are more fast twitch muscles working there.

That's all I know.

Post Reply