Body fat scales - how reliable is BF reading?

Discussions concerning various equipments, accessories, homemade items, gadgets, etc used in the pursuit of fitness

Moderators: Ironman, Jungledoc, darshana, stuward

Post Reply
toby123
Novice
Novice
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:12 pm
Location: UK

Body fat scales - how reliable is BF reading?

Post by toby123 » Sat Jan 03, 2009 6:06 am

I have a Tanita Body Composition Monitor, but I am wondering whether I should use the body fat percentage and kg of muscle mass functions. Are these values reliable or are there other factors which can interfere thus giving an inaccurate reading?

User avatar
TimD
In Memoriam: TimD
In Memoriam: TimD
Posts: 3129
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 8:04 am
Location: Va Beach, Va

Post by TimD » Sat Jan 03, 2009 11:32 am

I wouldn't bet on the reliability, because there are too many human factors that can throw bodyfat calculations off. HOWEVER, don't get rid of it. Use your first reading a a baseline, and judge your subsequent progress by the changes you recor in further readings. The Tanita may not be terribly accurate (baed on bone densities and other factors) but the readings WILL be consistent enough for you to determine any progress.
Tim

User avatar
Jungledoc
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7578
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 7:11 am
Location: Kudjip, Papua New Guinea

Post by Jungledoc » Sat Jan 03, 2009 8:17 pm

A few months ago some one posted a link to an article about BF measurement. It outlined the shortcomings and potential confounding variables of each method. My conclusion from reading the article was that no method is perfect, but that most are reliable enough for repeat measurements on a given individual to be meaningful. (Remember that "reliable" and "accurate" aren't the same thing.)

Has anyone kept track of that article?

Post Reply