Can't figure out that bootylicious crap.
while others would refer to some chick who has a larger @$$ but its on the body of someone who weighs 120 instead of 320 and has just the right shape to it as bootylicious.
That’s me… And I'm definitely not a boob guy as you can see below.
It's all about ratio & shape. Oh and "junk in trunk" needs to be firm.
A woman can be 5'4" and 110 lbs, and as long as she is all @$$ from the back of her knees to the middle of her back, it's booty-ful. If she is 175, she better have curves other places and be around 5'8". But on a "pure booty" rating system, I've seen plenty of bootys that get a 10, but are attached to woman I don't find attractive in whole.
A woman's @$$ can be as wide as she is tall, as long as it's firm, the only part of her that is that wide, and doesn't crinkle in the middle but rather the bottom while she walks, that is a fine @$$. It has to be ROUND, like a circle, oval or heart shaped, square or super sagging heart shaped (think over-ripened summer squash) is just unacceptable.
I have seen 2 @$$es in my life that went from an 8 in jeans to a 2 out… UGH. And have seen many more that go from a 6 in jeans to a 10 out.
General rule of thumb about the cottage cheese factor, if she is a mom, or over say 30, you have to give her a lot of leeway. But the right pants or "boy shorts" underwear makes all the difference in the world.
And if they tan, they need to try and avoid the tan lines that form under the crease of the @$$ where it meets the thigh. Not very attractive.
I know this is shallow, but hey I am who I am.