Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Ask or answer questions, discuss and express your views
Moderators: Ironman, Jungledoc, ianjay, stuward
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 1:07 pm
whats the scientific reason about this:
when doing incline press one has to take very less weight relatively to decline or flat bench press?
That is because the pectoralis major sternal, which is the strongest part of the group, does most of the work in the decline and falt bench. With inclines it doesn't do as much of the work, the clavicular head is being targeted.
- Junior Member
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 11:20 am
- Location: Maine
Why I'm sure it can be shown scientifically that sternal is much more potentially capable, it depends on how you work out, especially for beginners. If all you do is incline bench then the clavicular head will become stronger than the sternal one, it isn't by necessity weaker.
Because the sternal head is larger it has greater potential strength. Also, the ROM is shorter on a flat or decline bench press than it is on an incline bench press.
- Exalted Seer
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2006 11:20 pm
- Location: New York City
A common flaw among beginning/intermediate bodybuilders is an underdeveloped upper chest. Because flat/decline bench presses use more weight, ego-driven lifters ignore inclines except- maybe - for a couple of half-assed sets at the end of their chest workouts. Advanced bodybuilders, on the other hand, often begin their chest routines with inclines.
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:14 am
I've noticed that I seem to be a good bit weaker on incline when I go
than when I go
More so than what I gain in decline.