How strong?
Moderators: Ironman, Jungledoc, parth, stuward, jethrof
- manofsteel1385
- Apprentice
- Posts: 156
- Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:37 am
- Location: Syracuse NY
- Contact:
Strength is based on perception. It's simple really I think. If I hang out with a bunch of people that lift a lot less then me they perceive me as strong.
If I then hang out with people that are a lot stronger than me I perceive myself as weak.
Completely based on perception. A lot of people think I'm strong but I don't a lot of people think i am jacked but I don't there is someone that is always bigger stronger badder etc.
Main reason for motivation for me I think.
If I then hang out with people that are a lot stronger than me I perceive myself as weak.
Completely based on perception. A lot of people think I'm strong but I don't a lot of people think i am jacked but I don't there is someone that is always bigger stronger badder etc.
Main reason for motivation for me I think.
-
- Deific Wizard of Sagacity
- Posts: 4505
- Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 1:19 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
"hmmmmm this is such a weird topic, and ya bruce lee was in a lot of non official fights, Ive even read books as to him having these fights" - Immortal
So have Tank Abbot and Kimbo. My point is there's a big difference between someone who's won a lot of street fights and someone who can compete at the highest level against world class fighters.
So have Tank Abbot and Kimbo. My point is there's a big difference between someone who's won a lot of street fights and someone who can compete at the highest level against world class fighters.
-
- Deific Wizard of Sagacity
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Very true, although hard to prove in the case of Bruce Lee - since he died long before those kind of matches were legal and popular. He certainly fought other people, though, in both age-specific and "street" conditions. It's just silly to argue a "who would win?" with him because it'll all come down to opinion.Matt Z wrote:My point is there's a big difference between someone who's won a lot of street fights and someone who can compete at the highest level against world class fighters.
He did win the first (admittedly choreographed) MMA fight I'd even seen though, when he submits Sammo Hung on the ground in Enter the Dragon!

Back on the topic, the funny thing about strength is that it's easy to measure, but hard to get anyone to agree on what those numbers mean.
My training partner and I like to say, "more is always better...except when it comes to Reps". In other words, if you think you need more rest, then take it. More is always better. If you think you need more weight on the bar, then do it....more is always better.... If you think you need to do more reps, then don't. Reps don't count. Either more weight, rest, both, or nothing 
25 reps is 24 more than you need.
So, yeah, I go with the lifter who can put the most weight on the bar...
KPj

25 reps is 24 more than you need.
So, yeah, I go with the lifter who can put the most weight on the bar...
KPj
-
- Deific Wizard of Sagacity
- Posts: 5252
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 8:43 am
- Location: New Jersey
- Contact:
Heh. That's the opposite of my approach. A 1RM is meaningless in my sport, because you so rarely get to apply it. Reps and ability to perform for time are very important.KPj wrote:Reps don't count. Either more weight, rest, both, or nothing
I also train a fireman...his 1RM is steadily improving, but it's his ability to move heavy stuff repeatedly under stress that matters the most.
But 20 x 200 vs. 15 x 200 and a 450 1RM? I'd choose the latter guy as stronger. I'd bet I could take the latter guy and get him to 20 x 200 in no time at all, but it'll be harder to get the first guy a 450 deadlift unless he's very, very close to it.