Conventional Wisdom

Post by **stuward** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 11:41 am

My calendar runs out on Dec 31, then I'll get a new calendar.

frigginwizard · Post by **frigginwizard** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:55 pm

stuward wrote:My calendar runs out on Dec 31, then I'll get a new calendar.

or the world will end

Post by **TimD** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:05 pm

Well, this thread has been hijacked beyond repair. Why not start it back up in the lounge under "gloom and doom" or "the ancient prophecies", or "the Bilderbergers/Illuminade"
Tim

robertscott · Post by **robertscott** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 3:01 pm

I wonder what the Mayan's had pictures of on their calendar

frogbyte · Post by **frogbyte** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:03 pm

I'm still wondering wtf jml was even talking about.

jml · Post by **jml** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:29 pm

the guidelines come out again in 2015

Post by **Jungledoc** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:10 pm

pdellorto wrote:
ApolytonGP wrote:You can use your fighting skills against them, Pete.
Call me Peter, please. :)

I like to call him "Petey", but I have a reasonable chance of him never being able to find me.

Post by **Jungledoc** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:13 pm

jml wrote:There's always 2015

This is JML's only contribution to this thread, and look what he set off! He's hiding somewhere in Seattle just smirking at us all.

jml · Post by **jml** » Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:34 am

Jungledoc wrote:
jml wrote:There's always 2015
This is JML's only contribution to this thread, and look what he set off! He's hiding somewhere in Seattle just smirking at us all.

Sometimes, it's not the quantity but the quality.

frogbyte · Post by **frogbyte** » Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:56 am

"The Dietary Guidelines are jointly issued and updated every 5 years by the Departments of Agriculture (USDA) and Health and Human Services"

Ah heh. Am I the only one that didn't know that?

Post by **stuward** » Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:55 am

To get this back on track, some people smarter than me wrote a critique of the Dietary Guidlines report.

http://download.journals.elsevierhealth ... 002893.pdf

I haven't had a chance to read it yet but it is quite critical of the guidelines. This was linked to by The Healthy Skeptic.